Post hoc ergo propter hoc

Causal Fallacy
Definition Example
When a cause of a phenomenon is attributed to a prior phenomenon without providing sufficient evidence of a causal link. After I started wearing a copper bracelet, my health improved! It worked!
Also known as: false cause / coincidental correlation
  Notes
Causation must be rigorously demonstrated. Phenomena that occur in sequence do not necessarily have a causal link. This fallacy is related to the correlation is not causation fallacy.

Case Study One

Most people feel a period of elation every time they voluntarily change jobs. Many are tempted to cite the conditions of the new job as the reason for their better mood. Is it the new job that is causing the elation, or merely the change?


Case Study Two

Because a common cold runs its normal course after a few days, any medicine taken during that time may be erroniously proclaimed effective.


Case Study Three

The occasional occurance of a desired outcome after the prayer for that outcome by a religious person is often offered as “evidence” for the efficacy of prayer. Yet the times that there was a prayer with an undesirable outcome is not admitted as counter-evidence, and the similarly “answered” prayers made to gods of other religions are dismissed as coincidents.


Keep in mind that a fallacious argument does not entail an erroneous position.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: