← 2015 Edition

A substantive criticism of the focus on Logical Fallacies →

Acknowledging Contributions

March 18, 2015 Leave a comment

There has been a considerable amount of constructive feedback offered by a number of visitors. This is greatly appreciated. Changese were made, enough to call this version of the site 2.1. All future suggestions will be carefully considered. Thanks.

Filed under News

About Phil Stilwell
PR Manager at Credify.one | Critical Thinking Instructor at various universities in Tokyo

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Fallacy Index A-Z

Absence of evidence fallacy
^Evidential

Abstraction denial
^Conceptual

Abstraction fallacy
^Conceptual

Ad hominem
^{Tactical/Emotional}

Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
^Formal

Affirming a disjunct
^Formal

Affirming the consequent
^Formal

All or nothing fallacy
^{Epistemic/Evidential}

Appeal to accomplishment
^{Tactical/Evidential}

Appeal to emotion
^{Tactical/Emotional/Epistemic}

Appeal to authority
^{Emotional/Evidential}

Appeal to consequences
^{Emotional/Evidential}

Appeal to fear
^Emotional

Appeal to flattery
^Emotional

Appeal to motive
^{Emotional/Causal}

Appeal to novelty
^{Emotional/Perspectival/Tactical}

Appeal to pity
^Emotional

Appeal to ridicule
^Emotional

Appeal to spite
^Emotional

Appeal to nature
^{Conceptual/Perspectival}

Appeal to probability
^Mathematical

Appeal to tradition
^{Emotional/Evidential}

Argument from fallacy
^Evidential

Argument from ignorance
^Evidential

Argument from repetition
^Tactical

Argument from silence
^Evidential

Argumentum ad baculum
^{Emotional/Tactical}

Argumentum ad populum
^{Evidential/Conceptual/Epistemic}

Association fallacy
^{Tactical/Evidential/Formal}

Bare assertion fallacy
^{Evidential/Tactical}

Base rate fallacy
^Mathematical

Begging the question
^Formal

Bottom-up condemnation
^{Conceptual/Evidential}

Bottom-up justification
^{Conceptual/Evidential}

Cherry picking
^{Tactical/Evidential}

Chronological snobbery
^{Evidential/Perspectival}

Circular cause and consequence
^{Causal/Evidential}

Composition fallacy
^Conceptual

Confidence as a validator
^{Epistemic/Emotional}

Contextomy
^{Tactical/Linguistic}

Continuum fallacy
^{Conceptual/Linguistic}

Correlation is not causation
^Causal

Demanding a mechanism
^Evidential

Denial of the epistemic gradient
^{Epistemic/Evidential}

Denying a remote hypothetical
^{Evidential/Conceptual}

Denying the antecedent
^Formal

Denying the correlative
^Conceptual

Division fallacy
^Conceptual

Ecological fallacy
^{Mathematical/Conceptual}

Empty refutation
^Tactical

Equivocation
^Linguistic

Etymological fallacy
^Linguistic

Exclusive premises
^Formal

Fallacy of many questions
^Tactical

False analogy
^Conceptual

False compromise
^Conceptual

False dilemma
^Conceptual

False surrender
^Tactical

Faulty generalization
^{Conceptual/Evidential}

For the sake of argument denial
^{Conceptual/Epistemic}

Gambler's fallacy
^{Mathematical/Causal}

Genetic fallacy
^{Linguistic/Conceptual}

Hasty generalization
^{Evidential/Mathematical}

Historian's fallacy
^Perspectival

Homunculus fallacy
^{Conceptual/Perspectival}

Human standard fallacy
^{Conceptual/Perspectival}

Illicit major
^Formal

Imposed disbelief
^{Epistemic/Evidential}

Impotent logical space
^{Evidential/Conceptual}

Incomplete comparison
^Conceptual

Inconsistent comparison
^{Conceptual/Formal}

Intentional fallacy
^{Perspectival/Linguistic}

Is–ought problem
^Conceptual

Linearity fallacy
^{Conceptual/Mathematical}

Mental cause fallacy
^{Evidential/Epistemic}

Moving the goalpost
^{Tactical/Evidential}

Naturalistic fallacy
^{Perceptual/Conceptual/Evidential}

Negative proof fallacy
^Formal

No True Scotsman
^{Conceptual/Linguistic}

Overwhelming exception
^{Linguistic/Conceptual}

Package-deal fallacy
^Conceptual

Perfect solution fallacy
^{Conceptual/Evidential}

Perfect standard
^Conceptual

Perverted analogy
^{Tactical/Conceptual}

Piggy-back assumption
^Evidential

Poisoning the well
^Tactical

Post hoc ergo propter hoc
^Causal

Proof by example
^{Conceptual/Evidential}

Proof by verbosity
^{Tactical/Linguistic}

Psychologist's fallacy
^Perspectival

Red herring
^Tactical

Redeeming illogic with evidence
^Evidential

Regression fallacy
^{Causal/Mathematical}

Reification
^{Conceptual/Linguistic/Perspectival}

Retrospective determinism
^{Causal/Perspectival}

Semantic pixelization
^Linguistic

Sharpshooter fallacy
^{Evidential/Conceptual}

Single cause fallacy
^{Causal/Conceptual}

Slippery slope
^{Causal/Conceptual}

Special pleading
^{Evidential/Conceptual}

Spotlight fallacy
^Conceptual

Square logic
^Formal

Straw man argument
^Tactical

Suppressed correlative
^{Conceptual/Linguistic}

Teleological fallacy
^Conceptual

Thought-terminating cliché
^Tactical

Top-down condemnation
^{Conceptual/Evidential}

Top-down justification
^{Conceptual/Evidential}

Track-record reset
^Evidential

Tu quoque
^{Tactical/Evidential}

Undistributed middle
^Formal

Vague insulators
^Tactical

Wishful thinking
^{Emotional/Epistemic/Evidential}

Witness chain
^{Evidential/Conceptual}

Wrong causal direction
^Causal

%d bloggers like this: